Biography
Spaces that teach
My path into instructional design ran through architecture, a route that shaped how I approach the work today. Designing physical school environments taught me that space is never neutral, how something is structured, where attention is directed, and what feels intuitive or overwhelming, all influence whether learning is supported or hindered. I carry that same perspective into digital design. A course interface, a content sequence, an assessment flow: these are spaces too, requiring careful attention to structure, orientation, and the learner's experience.
I have applied this approach across different contexts. In Uzbekistan, I led the design and delivery of national teacher training programs across multiple regions and cohorts, developing learning experiences that needed to be adaptable, scalable, and effective across diverse classroom settings. This work grounded my ability to design not just for individual learners, but for systems.
Since then, I have built on that foundation at Georgetown University's CNDLS, where I design and support higher education courses in collaboration with faculty. My work includes course development, learning experience design, and quality assurance, ensuring that courses are not only well-structured but also engaging and aligned with learning goals. My practice is guided by frameworks such as UDL and ADDIE, allowing me to make intentional decisions about access, sequencing, and assessment while keeping the learner at the center.
What I have learned from architecture, Uzbekistan, and Georgetown is that design is always an act of intention. Every structure, sequence, and interaction either supports learning or gets in its way. As a learning designer, I make those decisions deliberately. I am creating experiences that are clear, engaging, and built to support how people actually learn.
Latest Work
Currently, I am exploring how conversational AI can transform learning, building instructional design with emerging technologies for personalized adaptive education experience.
Learning Framework

Inclusion Lens
My practice is guided by Universal Design for Learning — ensuring that every learning experience is accessible, engaging, and effective for all learners.

Stimulating interest and motivation for learning

Presenting information in multiple ways

Differentiating the ways learners can demonstrate knowledge
Using data and research to inform learning and instructional design decisions. Educational practices are grounded in credible evidence, continuous assessment, and evaluation to ensure effectiveness, relevance, and positive learner outcomes.
Designing educational programs and resources that could be efficiently adapted, and expanded across contexts and learners. Scalable design ensures growth and flexibility, at the same time maintaining instructional quality, learning effectiveness, and educational integrity.
Ensuring that all students have equal access to learning materials, tools, and environments necessary for learning journey. This includes proactively identifying and removing physical, technological, cognitive, and instructional barriers so that every learner can fully engage, achieve learning objectives, and benefit from high-quality education.

Robotics Professional Development for ICT Teachers
The Edison Robotics Workshop was a professional development program designed to equip Computer Science teachers in Uzbekistan with the knowledge and practical skills to teach robotics and programming effectively in secondary school classrooms. Participants engaged with a curriculum covering five programming environments: EdScratch, EduBlocks, EdPy, Python, and Edison-Loops, as well as the fundamentals of robot control systems. Sessions were structured to move teachers from accessible, visual block-based coding through to text-based programming languages, building confidence and competency at each stage. Practical, hands-on sessions formed the core of the workshop. Teachers worked directly with Edison robots, applying programming concepts in real time and developing the instructional skills needed to facilitate similar learning experiences for their students. Sessions also addressed pedagogical strategies for designing engaging and meaningful ICT lessons, ensuring participants left with both technical knowledge and the classroom tools to use it well. By the end of the workshop, participants had developed a working understanding of robotics and programming across multiple platforms, hands-on experience with physical robot systems, and a clear set of methods for integrating these tools into their professional teaching practice.
View Project

Technology-Enhanced Science Instruction Pilot
Natural science teachers in Uzbekistan's secondary schools face a significant instructional gap: while digital tools have transformed science education globally, most teachers have had little to no structured exposure to technology-enhanced pedagogy. Without training in how to design and deliver lessons using interactive platforms, educators default to lecture-based instruction that offers limited opportunities for student inquiry, experimentation, or engagement. The core challenge is access to practical, subject-relevant professional learning that bridges theory and classroom application. Existing professional development offerings rarely address the specific instructional needs of science educators or provide hands-on experience with the digital tools most suited to their disciplines. The pilot program brought together STEM teachers for a three-day immersive professional development seminar at School #110 in Tashkent, built not around passive training, but around learning by doing. Every session was purposefully sequenced: teachers first understood why a tool works pedagogically, then practiced using it with guidance. By the end of day three, participants had not only learned about PhET, Nearpod, and Kahoot, they had built lesson plans, designed assessments, and produced video content using them. That distinction matters. Most professional development asks teachers to absorb information and hope they apply it later. EdTechUz demanded applications from day one. The classroom materials teachers produced during the seminar were not exercises, they were deliverables, ready to use the following Monday. The results affirmed what the design intended. Teachers left the seminar not just informed, but capable. Certificates of completion recognized their professional growth, but the more meaningful outcome was visible in what they made: a cohort of science educators who now know how to design technology-enhanced learning experiences.
View Project

Multi-Phase Teacher Development Program
Research on how adults learn, and how teachers change their practice, is clear: lasting instructional transformation requires more than a single event. It requires time, repetition, reflection, and a community to learn with. That insight is the foundation of EdTechUz II. Building on the success of the EdTechUz pilot, this program was designed from the ground up as a multi-phase learning experience. EdTechUz II distributed learning across three distinct phases — each serving a specific purpose in the professional growth journey of science teachers. The first phase, held in August at School #110 in Tashkent, focused on acquisition. Teachers engaged in intensive, hands-on workshops that rebuilt and extended their EdTech skills, working with tools, designing materials, and beginning to think differently about what a science lesson can look like. They left with new skills and, more importantly, with a mandate: go try this in your classroom. The second phase, held online in September, was where the real learning happened. Teachers returned not as beginners, but as practitioners with six weeks of classroom experience behind them. What worked? What confused students? What needed to change? These sessions transformed individual trial-and-error into collective intelligence, and that shift, from isolated practice to shared learning, is what separates professional development that sticks from professional development that fades. The third and final phase, held in December at Cambridge International School in Tashkent, brought the cohort together one last time. Teachers demonstrated what they had built, shared what they had learned, and left the program not as participants, but as confident practitioners capable of designing technology-enhanced science instruction independently and sustainably. EdTechUz II is a proof of concept for what teacher professional development in Uzbekistan can be: rigorous, human-centered, and designed with the same intentionality we ask teachers to bring to their own classrooms.
View Project







